Friday, November 29, 2019
Biology Interpretation Essays - Design Of Experiments,
Biology: Interpretation Interpretation Statistical calculations made with the results obtained, conclude the null hypothesis previously made, is acceptable and there is in fact a relationship between percentage epiphyte cover and height from the ground. However, when studying the tables of results it is difficult to find a pattern in results obtained. This may be an indication that any relationship found may have been down to chance. This is also evident through the relatively large standard error figure calculated. As a result I believe that the data is not an accurate measure of the biological phenomenon and in a repeat experiment it would be suggested that more results were taken to reduce any margins for both statistical and human error. In this instance it would be much easier to find a trend in results and so, a more accurate interpretation could take place. Animal Science
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.